A working decision rehearsal
- Deterministic matched non-EO and EO comparison
- Strict evidence, provenance and refusal contracts
- Downloadable public-safe synthetic record
URBAN ECOTOPIA · SITE HEAT EVIDENCE REVIEW
Decide which heat-adaptation option deserves a closer look.
For London development and estate teams with one authorised site and one live decision. Compare historic Earth observation and site context through a bounded, traceable evidence workflow before commissioning more detailed investigation.
WORKING SYNTHETIC PROOF · LIVE PILOT EVIDENCE OPEN · LONDON
FIG. 01 / PROPOSED METHODFICTIONAL SITE · ILLUSTRATIVE DRAWINGNO MEASURED RESULT
BOUNDEDFix one site and one live decision.
The geography, options, reviewer and permitted use are declared before analysis begins.
01 / PRODUCT MATURITY
A PUBLIC CLAIM LEDGER
Inspect what works, what needs a pilot and what is not claimed.
Local engineering evidence can demonstrate a controlled workflow. Only an authorised site, retained customer response and independent review can establish real-world value.
One authorised London site
- A live decision, deadline and current alternative
- Rights-cleared historic Earth observation
- A qualified reviewer and agreed usefulness test
Evidence still to be earned
- Customer demand or professional acceptance
- Measured cooling, compliance or planning approval
- An insurer-ready pricing engine or operational digital twin
LOCAL VALIDATION IS NOT CUSTOMER, SCIENTIFIC, LEGAL OR GRANT VALIDATION
02 / THE DECISION
THE QUESTION AFTER SCREENING
Move from “where is heat visible?” to “which option deserves investigation?”
A heat map can show a pattern. The service is designed to compare a limited set of tree, shade, cool-roof and surface options, then explain why a priority changed and where the evidence may fail.
- SCOPE
- One authorised site
- DECISION
- One live adaptation question
- OUTPUT
- One human-reviewed evidence pack
03 / EVIDENCE CHAIN
OBSERVATION · PHYSICS · MODELLING · REVIEW
The analytical chain is the product.
Observed, derived, modelled and reviewed information never collapse into one opaque score. Each hand-off retains its state, source and authority.
- 01OBSERVEDEarth observation
Historic surface signals with date, coverage and source rights.
- 02DERIVEDSite features
Physical form, street topology, canopy, surface and social context.
- 03MODELLEDBounded options
Explicit input changes compared at the same site and spatial support.
- 04TRACEDEvidence and limits
Lineage, uncertainty, validation state and applicability remain attached.
- 05REVIEWEDHuman decision
An accountable reviewer may release, narrow or stop the analysis.
04 / WHAT LANDS ON THE DESK
A RETAINED DECISION RECORD
One site. A bounded comparison. One evidence pack.
Each candidate priority arrives with the evidence needed to inspect it and the limits needed to challenge it. No dashboard screenshot is treated as a decision record.
Inspect the evidence standard- 01Historic surface heat and vegetation baseline
- 02Candidate intervention screening map
- 03Assumptions, limitations and evidence gaps
- 04Source and method manifest
- 05Technical annex for professional review
- 06Monitoring specification for later implementation
05 / START WITH A DECISION
ONE SITE · ONE LIVE QUESTION
Bring the site, decision, options and reviewer.
A useful pilot conversation starts with four things. No site files are collected through this website.
- 01An authorised London development, regeneration site or bounded estate
- 02A live concept-design, pre-application or investment decision
- 03A named decision deadline and current alternative
- 04A qualified professional willing to review the evidence boundary