The product is not only the map. It is the retained record.
The proposed evidence pack would keep what was observed, how it was processed, what remains uncertain and who approved its use attached to the decision. The public dossier below records what the local prototype can and cannot currently establish.
01 / PUBLIC EVIDENCE DOSSIER
ALLOW-LISTED · DETERMINISTIC · PUBLIC-SAFE
A machine-readable record of the current claim boundary.
Contract, structure and reproducibility checks pass locally. No professional review was performed and this record has no decision or tender-gate authority.
Cross-case reuse remains conditional on authorised cases demonstrating utility, rights clearance and delivery economics.
future horizon
OPEN EVIDENCE
What must still be earned
OPEN
A named, authorised site and rights-cleared observed inputs.
OPEN
A retained customer protocol and attributable evaluation of decision usefulness.
OPEN
Independent scientific review of the selected method, support and interpretation boundary.
OPEN
Documented authority, source rights and asset-specific IP chain of title.
OPEN
Observed buyer intent, accepted scope, delivery economics and price evidence.
OPEN
Every submission gate closed in the controlled application pack.
UNSUPPORTED CLAIMS
What this product does not establish
NOT ESTABLISHED
Observed site performance or realised cooling
NOT ESTABLISHED
Customer validation, commercial demand or willingness to pay
NOT ESTABLISHED
Scientific validity, causal impact or model transferability
NOT ESTABLISHED
Tender eligibility, legal clearance, IP ownership or regulatory compliance
NOT ESTABLISHED
Grant readiness, endorsement, selection or award
NOT ESTABLISHED
Proof that Earth observation is indispensable
NOT ESTABLISHED
Planning approval, building compliance, certification or professional decision authority
NOT ESTABLISHED
Validated financial loss, asset valuation or insurance pricing
Local structural and reproducibility validation is implementation evidence only. It is not customer validation, scientific validation, legal validation or grant validation.
02 / PROPOSED EVIDENCE RECORD
FIVE REQUIRED FIELDS
Every candidate priority carries its limits.
No source permission, no acquisition.No accountable review, no release.
01
Source
Publisher, product, version, observation date and spatial support.
02
Rights
Permitted access, use, transformation, attribution and output conditions.
03
Method
Process identity, assumptions, comparison rule and validity boundary.
04
Uncertainty
Coverage, missingness, sensitivity and unresolved evidence.
05
Review
Named role, decision, review state and release record.
03 / PACK ANATOMY
VERSIONED AND REVIEWABLE
Evidence remains attached at every hand-off.
PROPOSED INTEROPERABILITY PATTERNInspect one evidence item.OKF v0.2 informed · no trust score · no measured result
SOURCE RECORDS
Rights remain a separate mandatory gate.
SOURCE
EVIDENCE CONCEPTSite heat observation
type
EO evidence record
sources
linked and attributable
generated
actor and time recorded
verified
scope remains visible
status
draft · current · superseded
HAND-OFF
DECISION RECEIPTPROFESSIONAL REVIEW
RELEASENARROWSTOP
Named role · review date · bounded decision
01 / SOURCEEO acquisition and processing record
product · observation date · spatial support
A recorded source does not establish permitted commercial use.
04 / PROFESSIONAL BOUNDARY
WHAT THE PACK DOES NOT DETERMINE
A more defensible hand-off, not an automated verdict.
Indoor overheating or thermal comfort from EO alone
Part O, TM52 or TM59 compliance
Planning approval or engineering feasibility
Certified simulation or guaranteed cooling
Realised resilience or emissions outcomes
Automated professional judgement
Insurer pricing, disclosure filing or solvency conclusions without specialist review